-
d-nett likes this
-
latinagabi likes this
-
monsieurleblanc likes this
-
peachchild reblogged this from atheismfuckyeah
-
thewomblefish likes this
-
satanismycopilot likes this
-
nocticola reblogged this from atheismfuckyeah
-
thewinchesterinitiative reblogged this from atheismfuckyeah
-
bindiboo reblogged this from atheismfuckyeah
-
atheismfuckyeah posted this
Hearings begin in ‘Christian persecution’ cases at European Court of Human Rights
Today the European Court of Human Rights will begin chamber hearings in the the cases of Chaplin v. the United Kingdom, Eweida v. the United Kingdom, Ladele v. the United Kingdom and McFarlane v. the United Kingdom. The applicants, four practicing Christians’, complain that domestic law failed to adequately protect their right to manifest their religion. The British Humanist Association (BHA) has stated that domestic courts were right to uphold human rights and equalities law and principles in dismissing cases of alleged Christian discrimination.
The cases involve Lillian Ladele, the registrar who refused to fulfil her duties because of her ‘orthodox Christian beliefs’ against same-sex partnerships and Gary McFarlane, who refused to treat gay couples equally with straight ones in his job as a counsellor at Relate; and the cases of Nadia Eweida, who has repeatedly lost her claims of religious discrimination against her employer British Airways, and of Shirley Chaplin, who claimed that uniform codes violated her human rights as a Christian.
BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson commented, ‘Our domestic courts have been robust in dismissing these cases and the victim narrative that lies behind them has no basis in reality. What they describe as discrimination and marginalisation of Christians is in fact the proper upholding of human rights and equalities law and principles. All reasonable people will agree that there is scope in a secular democracy for reasonable accommodation of religious beliefs when that accommodation does not affect the rights and freedoms of others. But if believers try to invoke their beliefs as a defence for treating other people badly – denying them a service because they are gay or claiming a right to preach at them in a professional context – the law is right to prevent them.’
—-
(Bolding of the above is mine.)
For these guys, read:
‘Wahwahwah, I don’t like gay people, I shouldn’t have to do the job I’m paid to do, wahwahwah.’
‘Wahwahwah, all those funny looking people get to wear their religious things, except when it contravenes the uniform codes and then they don’t, I think I should get to wear mine all the time whatever the uniform codes, wahwahwah.’
etc.
Basically.
~Mooglets